Surveys … Apparently They’re Dead! - Davies

Sionic has become Davies Learn More

Surveys … Apparently They’re Dead!

Rather than falling into the trap of meaningless metrics, the impact of surveys lies in their ability to extract actionable insights through well-crafted questions and informed analysis.

 

Survey filled out

 

I have seen a lot of articles recently stating that “Customer surveys are dead”. However, when you scratch beneath the surface, you often find the real story isn’t quite as dramatic as the headline.

The rumours of my demise have been greatly exaggerated” – Mark Twain

This is, of course, true of the Mark Twain quote. Twain actually said, “The report of my death was an exaggeration”, and so it seems the report of the report of his death was exaggerated too.

As humans, we have this tendency to exaggerate problems, especially if you’re trying to sell something, or even if you just want people to read your LinkedIn post! So, what is the real problem with surveys, are they becoming redundant, is their demise real?

Overcoming Common Survey Pitfalls for More Accurate Results

As someone who has received many surveys, I notice a common problem. People often overthink or underthink the questions. When the questions are poor, the data is also poor.

Survey data analysis is also a major challenge, even when the data is of sufficient quality. These problems inevitably lead to the exaggerated conclusion that surveys don’t work and thus are ‘dead’. This is because they fail to help achieve actionable insight.

Factors contributing to this perceived demise of surveys include:

Irrelevant Metric Questions

Have you ever been asked if you’d recommend a customer service centre? Under what circumstance am I making this recommendation? Either the person needs your help or they don’t, it isn’t optional.

Undefined Question Subjects

A common example is ‘Ease’. Most surveys ask if you found the process ‘easy’, but what does ‘easy’ mean, does it have one consistent definition?

It could be a slow or long process, it could be complexity of information, and so on. During survey analysis, how do you know what the respondent meant? Simple answer, you don’t.

If you don’t define the question, you cannot define their answer. Therefore, you cannot confidently or accurately develop actions from the results.

Excessive Use of ‘Survey-Speak’

Too often questions are framed in a way that you would never choose if you were speaking directly to a person. Talking to people as if they are human is more likely to get a human response. This response shows how they felt about their experience.

For example, have you ever been asked to ‘in your own words, tell us’. Who else’s words were they expecting? Do they get a barrage of Gandhi or Socrates quotes, maybe lots of King-esque “I have a dream” feedback?

We shouldn’t be seeking a statement-like response. Ask a human question, get a human answer.

Over-Indexing the Value of Metric Scores:

Often the goal is seen as “Increase the NPS/CSAT Score”. This should not be the goal; we should be seeking to improve the actual experience.

The score increasing is a consequence of the goal, not the goal itself. The metric helps us understand that change may have occurred, providing the starting point of the analysis, not the end. The score is a ‘what’ not a ‘why’.

Failure to Find the ‘why’

Quantitative data can only ever tell you the ‘what’ – you must investigate the qualitative data to find the ‘why’.

Actionable insights come from understanding the ‘why.’ However, the value of expert qualitative analysis is often ignored. Because of this, actions are based on the ‘what’ instead of the ‘why.’

As a practice, we could call this ‘guessing’, which is why actions taken are often ineffective. Establish the ‘why’ and you remove the need for guessing, with actions driven by evidence rather than opinions.

What is the Survey for, what am I trying to Achieve?

To choose the right tool for your goal, you need to understand your objective. This way, your survey can be aligned effectively. This enables the question setter and the respondent to focus on the subject without distraction or confusion.

Good output requires good input. By improving how you collect survey data, you can use that data to take action.

When it comes to customer surveys, I see one overarching objective split into two sub-objectives:

  • Gather opinions and views from customers to create actionable customer experience insights. This will lead to improvements in their customer experience journey.

1.      Seek customer opinions on key business questions – Customer Research.

2.      Seek customer insight on what they value (NOT their opinions on what you value) – Voice of the Customer.

Crafting Effective Survey Questions for Targeted Research

It is important to understand this delineation between ‘Research’ and ‘Voice’. Both processes are valuable, but only when aligned to the correct objective. They can also be used in unison.

Maybe your VOC survey draws your attention to a developing issue, but you want to gather more knowledge before acting. A targeted Research survey can help evidence the issue and define the action.

For either method, it is vital to ensure that we get the questions right. Therefore, we must create the survey with an eye towards the final analysis.

  • Make sure questions are relevant to your objectives.
  • Make sure questions are defined. To the earlier point, if we conclude that ‘Ease’ is a mixture of ‘Time’ and ‘Info Clarity’, then ask about those subjects separately instead. Make life easy for the respondent and the analyst, a win-win.
  • Get to the point and offer valuable guidance. For free text, instead of ‘in your own words’, encourage them to elaborate and explain the value of doing so. For example, “… if you can provide details around processes, timeframes, etc. this will help us to understand and improve the service”. Getting to the point isn’t always about reducing the number of words used.
  • Align your quantitative and qualitative analysis and ensure that the skills and methods required for high-quality qualitative analysis are prioritised.

The idea that “Surveys are Dead” often focuses on replacing reactive ‘Listening’ with ‘Predictive’ methods, i.e. can we predict future NPS or CSAT scores? This aligns with some of the key issues highlighted, above.

People often give too much importance to the metric score. On its own, it does not offer useful insights. This focus on metrics shows a false goal of “increasing the score”. Our real goal should be to improve the customer experience. Then we can see how to optimise all the customer feedback tools.

 

Although bad surveys should be dead, by clarifying our survey goals, we can create better questions. We also need to spend time and resources to analyse the survey data. This will help us generate actionable insights. Effective surveys are important for improving the customer experience.

 

Get in touch today to find out how we can help you enhance your customer experience.

Meet the Expert

Chris Turner

Senior Analyst

Customer Experience

I am an experienced analyst with an extensive background in customer and employee experience, providing subject matter expertise in Voice of the Customer and Voice of the Employee strategy and delivery.

Explore more blogs

Customer Experience
Davies Placeholder logo

Reflecting on the FCA’s Consumer Duty Anniversary Presentations 

Last week marked the 1-year anniversary of the FCA’s Consumer Duty regulation, a milestone commemorated with a series of presentations ...

Customer Experience
London building with graphic, depicting market abuse and conduct risk

Generative AI: The Hidden Costs

What Every Business Must Know

Customer Experience

Connected Intelligence #2: Digital Twins vs Static Models

The power of a digital twin lies in the centralisation and connectedness of Operational Intelligence in a single platform.